Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Como sobrevivir a la primera edad
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 02:22, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Como sobrevivir a la primera edad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable book. Not enough significant coverage in reliable sources. Previously deleted via PROD. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 16:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 16:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. In addition to the worst English I've ever seen in an article, this article is a recreation of a previously PROD'd article and should thus be deleted, and half the article is a biography of the author in the first place. In the best interest of Wikipedia, ~Ngeaup (talk) 17:47, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Recreation from prod is okay (it's basically contesting the proposed deletion). However, that's not the real problem here: this is a self-published book (published by Amazon's print-on-demand subsidiary CreateSpace), with absolutely zero coverage in third-party reliable sources. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 18:21, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.