Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 March 4
March 4
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. asilvering (talk) 05:34, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- File:Power House title card.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hotwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCCP 120.29.79.29 (talk) 01:59, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure why this was mentioned here. I would like to know the exact reason. Hotwiki (talk) 05:37, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep as-is I see no rationale for deletion and this appears to be a frivolous nomination. Buffs (talk) 17:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 23:49, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- File:DYHB747.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Veluz330 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- Delete Fails WP:NFCP also similar to Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 22#File:DYHB747.jpg 120.29.79.29 (talk) 06:17, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep if it's their current logo. Add a FUR. Buffs (talk) 17:21, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- File:Takeout-seanandwei.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Datoe33 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
De-PRODded by an IP editor without a rationale. A behind-the-scenes image/screenshot of the film director shooting a movie may be insufficiently supported by critical commentary or unnecessary when brief description already illustrates (without NFC) how the film was produced, In other words, the image might not be contextually significant after all. George Ho (talk) 13:33, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Not released; copyrighted. Buffs (talk) 17:22, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
Not released
. Actually, it was previously released in a then-official website. George Ho (talk) 17:38, 4 March 2025 (UTC)- Let me rephrase: it was not released from full copyright via CC-by-X. Buffs (talk) 17:53, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- If copyright status is your main concern, I was able to retrieve the old email addresses and sent them messages, thinking that they may be still active. George Ho (talk) 20:28, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Let me rephrase: it was not released from full copyright via CC-by-X. Buffs (talk) 17:53, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 23:50, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- File:Jeffrussolivepic.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ontheroad111 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
It is unclear that this image is legitimately Free. The lack of information about when and where the photo was taken and the lack of EXIF metadata cast doubt as to the uploader's ownership of the file. OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 17:16, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Keep I see no evidence the file is anything other than a user uploaded photo. Missing EXIF data is not evidence. I can find no evidence the file existed anywhere on the internet prior to its upload, there is no evidence the file belongs to someone else, and I have no reason to believe the uploader isn't the owner. Location and date are fine to have, but they are not required. If you have something else, I'm willing to change my mind. Buffs (talk) 18:49, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- White corners indicate that this is a scanned image. The file can only be kept if the uploader confirms that the photo - not a scan - was taken by themself. — Ирука13 10:18, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:26, 4 March 2025 (UTC)- The uploader stated upon uploading that they were the copyright holder: "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license...". You are adding criteria for uploading. If there is consensus to do so, I understand, but that is not a requirement right now. Buffs (talk) 17:17, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per WP:G7. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:54, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- File:Walter Gladwin.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Elli (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This appears to not actually be Walter Gladwin. I came across https://assembly.state.ny.us/write/upload/postings/2014/pdfs/20140213_0056406.pdf, where in page 16, is the same photo identified as "Samuel Wright". I've since found a number of other photos whose provenance I trust, which show a different man (see File:Walter Gladwin 1954.jpg) identified as Gladwin.
Since this was non-free and is no longer used in the article, I believe it should be deleted. RoySmith (talk) 22:51, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Welp, that's slightly embarrassing. I'll G7 it. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:54, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.