neodrive.xyz Neodrive.xyz

   
NeoDrive

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Neodrive.xyz?

• 5.62E-5% of global Internet users visit Neodrive.xyz

How many people visit Neodrive.xyz each day?

• Neodrive.xyz receives approximately 2.8K visitors and 29,871 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Neodrive.xyz receive most of its visitors from?

• Neodrive.xyz is mostly visited by people located in Bangladesh,India,Pakistan.

How much Neodrive.xyz can earn?

• Neodrive.xyz should earn about $5.77/day from advertising revenue.

What is Neodrive.xyz estimated value?

• Estimated value of Neodrive.xyz is $5,984.18.

What IP addresses does Neodrive.xyz resolve to?

• Neodrive.xyz resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3035::6815:273b, 172.64.80.1.

Where are Neodrive.xyz servers located in?

• Neodrive.xyz has servers located in United States.

neodrive.xyz Profile

Title:NeoDrive
Description:Easy way to share your files
Edit Site Info

What technologies does neodrive.xyz use?

These are the technologies used at neodrive.xyz. neodrive.xyz has a total of 10 technologies installed in 11 different categories.
UI frameworks
Bootstrap Bootstrap
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Web Frameworks
CodeIgniter CodeIgniter
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
Open Graph Open Graph
Caching
Litespeed Cache Litespeed Cache
WordPress plugins
Litespeed Cache Litespeed Cache
JavaScript Libraries
Swiper Swiper
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
Databases
MySQL MySQL

neodrive.xyz Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 2.8K visitors daily, generating a total of 29.9K pageviews. This equates to about 84K monthly visitors. Neodrive.xyz traffic has decreased by 42.43% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors2.8K
37.45%
Monthly Visits84K
42.43%
Pages per Visit10.77
30.76%
Visit duration08:08
1.76%
Bounce Rate23.89%
45.33%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
2,773
Monthly Visits:
84,022
Pages per Visit:
10.77
Daily Pageviews:
29,871
Avg. visit duration:
08:08
Bounce rate:
23.89%
Global Reach:
5.62E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
114,461
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
41,427
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
84,874
HypeRank:
n/a
SimilarWeb Rank:
248,792
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
78.96%
Referral:
20.42%
Search:
0%
Social:
0.62%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
38.47%
Mobile:
61.53%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

176.4K
DEC
145.9K
JAN
84K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Bangladesh 88.04%
 
India 10.26%
 
Pakistan 1.24%
 
Korea, Republic of 0.46%

Which sites are competitors to neodrive.xyz?

Websites similar to neodrive.xyz are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 4 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with neodrive.xyz in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
4

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  neodrive.xyz
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $5.8 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $173.1 and annual gross revenue of approximately $2.1K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $6K.

How much would neodrive.xyz make?

Daily Revenue:
$5.77
Monthly Revenue:
$173.10
Yearly Revenue:
$2,106.05
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Bangladesh 26,299$4.47
 
India 3,063$1.16
 
Korea, Republic of 139$0.08
 
Pakistan 370$0.06

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.44
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$13.09
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$159.30
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
1,508
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
45,227
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
550,261

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
India 858$0.33
 
Bangladesh 526$0.09
 
Pakistan 118$0.02
 
Korea, Republic of 6$0.00

How much is neodrive.xyz worth?

Website Value:
$6K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
neodrive.xyz
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
neodrive.xyz
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
neodrive.xyz
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is neodrive.xyz hosted? ▼

Neodrive.xyz may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700:3035::6815:273b, 172.64.80.1
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 172.64.80.1

How fast does neodrive.xyz load? ▼

The average loading time of neodrive.xyz is 266 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 89.
Average Load Time:
266 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 40% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 40% 52% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 52% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 69% 21% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)57ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 40% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 40% 52% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 52% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 69% 21% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 21% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)57ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 89% 6% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 0.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 0.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 0.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

89
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.3s 40% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 30% 59% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 59% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.5s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 51% 31% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 31% 17% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)679ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 63% 8% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 8% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 28%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.5s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 74% 15% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 15% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.3s 30% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 30% 59% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 59% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.5s 51% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 51% 31% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 31% 17% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)679ms 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 63% 8% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 8% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 28%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.5s 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 74% 15% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 15% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 2.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 3.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 3.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Largest Contentful Paint 3.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

Does neodrive.xyz use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on neodrive.xyz are reduced by 75%.
neodrive.xyz use br compression.
Original size: 10.76 KB
Compressed size: 2.59 KB
File reduced by: 8.18 KB (75%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  UNKNOWN

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. neodrive.xyz supports HTTPS.
 neodrive.xyz supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: neodrive.xyz
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: E6
Valid from: Mar 21 08:18:05 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 19 08:18:04 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: E6
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 neodrive.xyz supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 05:37:01 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
set-cookie: csrf_cookie_neodrive=f21fa4319284a8be658a84f6ae842ee4; expires=Sun, 23-Mar-2025 07:37:01 GMT; Max-Age=7200; path=/; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax
set-cookie: ci_session=6rl5duodso7ec7ql416q0hg7m6350emh; expires=Sun, 23-Mar-2025 07:37:01 GMT; Max-Age=7200; path=/; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax
expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
cache-control: max-age=0
pragma: no-cache
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-turbo-charged-by: LiteSpeed
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=dOjcgzFB6w3YnIHppp5%2BNXVy7cabsAT0ePP9R8DcIFDjr01aR%2FV3dllg8jORvHHCzALCZ5GgOoywChVT3h%2FKLXjTELL5T84TQILJ1oPot8MXfjb9n4Wtrtqk5Eag9z8%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 924b93108fda0012-ORD
content-encoding: br
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=7088&min_rtt=1975&rtt_var=10634&sent=8&recv=11&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=2989&recv_bytes=892&delivery_rate=1458207&cwnd=217&unsent_bytes=0&cid=2c443dba0c451f21&ts=259&x=0"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3035::ac43:a9b3 250
AAAA 2606:4700:3035::6815:273b 250
A 172.64.80.1 232
NS porter.ns.cloudflare.com 3550
NS chelsea.ns.cloudflare.com 3550
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on January 26, 2024 and will expire on January 26, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Spaceship, Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on January 5, 2025.
Domain Created:
2024-01-26
Domain Expires:
2026-01-26
Domain Updated:
2025-01-05
Domain Age:
1 years 2 months 2 days
Domain Registrar:
Spaceship, Inc.
Domain Owner:
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy e
WhoIs:
 

Domain name: neodrive.xyz
Registry Domain ID: D428058306-CNIC
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.spaceship.com
Registrar URL: https://www.spaceship.com
Registrar: Spaceship, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 3862
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.6613102107
Reseller: Spaceship, Inc.
Creation Date: 2024-01-26T18:13:08Z
Updated Date: 2025-01-05T10:17:58Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2026-01-26T23:59:59Z
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: sj0qc66tteocdfp4
Registrant Name: Redacted for Privacy Purposes
Registrant Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Registrant Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2
Registrant City: Reykjavik
Registrant State/Province: Capital Region
Registrant Postal Code: 101
Registrant Country: IS
Registrant Phone: +354.4212434
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: https://www.spaceship.com/domains/whois/contact/?d=neodrive.xyz
Registry Admin ID: m0k0kvaetff26ayb
Admin Name: Redacted for Privacy Purposes
Admin Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Admin Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2
Admin City: Reykjavik
Admin State/Province: Capital Region
Admin Postal Code: 101
Admin Country: IS
Admin Phone: +354.4212434
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: https://www.spaceship.com/domains/whois/contact/?d=neodrive.xyz
Registry Tech ID: gpuqbp5lu35c2ijg
Tech Name: Redacted for Privacy Purposes
Tech Organization: Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Tech Street: Kalkofnsvegur 2
Tech City: Reykjavik
Tech State/Province: Capital Region
Tech Postal Code: 101
Tech Country: IS
Tech Phone: +354.4212434
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: 
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: https://www.spaceship.com/domains/whois/contact/?d=neodrive.xyz
Name Server: chelsea.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: porter.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-23T05:37:51.14Z